Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repossession Agent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to Repossession. Deathphoenix ʕ 05:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as randomcrapcruft that is also attack on repo men. M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Repossession after making NPOV. The info is useful and would improve Repossession. :) Dlohcierekim 00:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Dlohcierekim. Beno1000 00:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename repo men (most well-known name) and tag for cleanup or rewrite or whatever. youngamerican (talk) 02:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge whatever neutral content there is to Repossession, as per most of the above. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 03:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above. Funnybunny (^talk/_QRVS) 04:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm planning to improve it in the future. Also, how is it NPOV and an attack on repo men? Got nothing against them, considering that I'm looking at it as a future carreer choice. Dan Knoop 04:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 04:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no sources - OR, unless improved VERY quickly. Tyrenius 06:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Cleanup and merge in to Repossession as the actions of the individuals in question are synonymous with the job.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No sources for the claims. +Hexagon1 (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• What I'd like to know is, where'd this symbol come from? For about four of my votes, an image showed up, but before and since my votes have been fairly plain. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 22:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Somebody should make some AfD templates that include the image. :-) — RJH 15:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge (into Repossession) and Clean Up, the article suggests these baliffs (as I know them), are thieves. DannyM 08:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per above. joturner 16:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to repo man and cleanup....Scott⁵¹¹⁴ 19:17, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to repossession per above. Seems a fair summary to me, and I don't see many PoV issues in the version I read. Smerdis of Tlön 20:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and create redirect. I fixed the original research aspect, what's left is barely worth having. Great film, though - Harry Dean Stanton can be brilliant on a good day :-) Just zis Guy you know? 20:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's perfectly NPOV, certainly not "an atack on repo men". Perhaps should be merged into repossession. Cadr 20:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Not now, it's not - I fixed it. But what's left is negligible and already covered in repossession. Just zis Guy you know? 11:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.