Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reprodiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism. Term (cross between reproduction and diction) doesn't Google; is this a hoax? If it's a definition then should it be in Wiktionary? RobertG ♬ talk 14:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. Mark K. Bilbo 16:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. --StuffOfInterest 18:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom abakharev 02:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.