- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 01:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Tagged for CSD-A7, but claims notability (or notoriety, at least) in US so sent here instead. Note: technical nomination - no vote from me. ➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 15:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete As a vanity page of a NN blogger. Google search of the blogger's pen name and real name [1] gets no hits of which would satisfy WP:WEB. Other searches [2][3] indicate his activity in blogger flamewars, but still clearly NN. Bige1977 16:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Amcfreely 16:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Bige. 10 Ghits for a blogger is remarkably low. You can get more hits than that Googling my old BBS handles from the 80's. --Deville (Talk) 20:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete seems a case of vanity. --Francisco Valverde 20:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. DarthVader 06:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: User:RepublicanVet has blanked the article and replaced it with a personal attack, then twice vandalized the AFD page, including the rather noxious practice of inserting material under another user's signature [4]. I've blocked him for 48 hours for disruption, and sprotected this page because I fully expect him to try and vandalize it again. Stifle (talk) 21:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as advertising for an offensive blog. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete vanity, advertisement. --
Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 00:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.