Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Residents' Committee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. There is some dispute here as to whether the title is a suitable redirect, so I'm not going to close this as Redirect, but this discussion does not prevent anyone from creating a redirect or discussing the redirection elsewhere. Hut 8.5 21:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Residents' Committee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and devoid of meaningful content. Only link is dead. Rathfelder (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 01:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist Music1201 talk 15:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 15:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nomination. I don't support a Redirect as the article title itself is without context/precision and does not relate to Singapore. A search within WP of the term finds many "residents committees" worldwide. The term could be a DAB, these committees were notable and had articles but none of them are, so not even a DAB is warranted. MB 14:11, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - somebody might be looking for the concept, and find this. Bearian (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.