Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NBOOK fail. All the reviews that could be found are blogs and otherwise not RS, and everything else is primary. Fermiboson (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Politics, Technology, and United Kingdom. Fermiboson (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and improve, there's a review online by the The Orwell Society [1], a combination review and interview in Computer Weekly [2], more mentions in another CW discussion article [3], several cites in a peer-reviewed Springer journal article [4]. I think it just about clears WP:NBOOK. Wikishovel (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I (Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)) am unfamiliar with discussions ... I was trying to edit that one of the review is already an article. I refer to this reference: Golumbia, D. (2023). Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence, by Dan McQuillan. Critical AI, 1(1–2). doi:10.1215/2834703X-10734967. The Journal is Critical AI https://read.dukeupress.edu/critical-ai/[reply]

(Andrea Saltelli Saltean Thanks Wikishovel - I now read and insert the Computer Weekly one (the Orwell Society entry is already in).
Draftify while the article is being improved and the references are beefed up. Multiple mentions in Computer Weekly and other journals suggest notability, but we can reexamine the issue once we're ready to move the page back to main namespace. Owen× ☎ 16:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Draftify. I am for the moment done with inserting the last review, so unless I receive more hints from the community I pause here. Thanks to all! Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Link 3 is fine, and two more, although the first is from his publisher [5], and [6] Oaktree b (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Oaktree. Trying now to get access to these pieces - my virtual library does not have them. Back as soon as I get them Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 07:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

McQuillan, D., Jarke, J., & Pargman, T. C. (2023). We Are at an Extreme Point Where We Have to Go All in on What We Really Believe Education Should Be About. Postdigital Science and Education. doi:10.1007/s42438-023-00433-5

Selkälä, T. (2022). Healthily futile: a quest for a different AI. Justice, Power and Resistance, 5(3), 322–330. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 07:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Added a reference to the review of Selkälä; I think this should be sufficient, also because the other reference kindly suggested by Oaktree is from Mc Quillan himself. Please let me know and thanks again. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The sources now seem to get it just over the notability hurdle, but the quality is a little too lacking for mainspace. Once it has some time being polished a little, it should be fine to bring back. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify -- We have an editor, Saltean, who is keen to improve the article, and the subject passes WP:GNG. There could be an excellent, encyclopaedic article here. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 15:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.