Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resolution Revolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to British Humanist Association. Under WP:NACD, closure seems appropriate as there is a fair consensus. Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution Revolution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article contains little information about the initiative itself, and reads much more like an advert for the British Humanist Association. Half the content is testimonials and opinions which don't really belong on Wikipedia at all. The initiative could get a mention in the appropriate section of the British Humanist Association's page, but the article should be deleted. Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Admittedly a good article in its current form... However, the subject of the article is the object of independent media coverage, such as THIS ONLINE STORY BY THE GUARDIAN. An article for improvement, not deletion. Carrite (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to British Humanist Association. Yes, there is some minimal coverage of this particular initiative, but not enough in my opinion to support a full article on the subject. There is not even a mention of this initiative in the BHA article, and the BHA article doesn't have any WP:LENGTH issues. —SW— ^gossip 19:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into British Humanist Association per Snottywong. This isn't an especially notable initiative but the existence of some minor media coverage might merit inclusion of the topic as part of the parent organisation page. MLA (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to British Humanist Association per SnottyWong. There appears to be enough coverage that this should be mentioned (a sentence or two), but not enough continuing coverage or impact that it should be a full article. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as per the arguments given. I don't rule out the possibility that a page like this could be free-standing if there were significantly more to say about it, but given the Bus Campaign is on the BHA page and that's probably had 10x the amount of media coverage that this campaign has had, it seems reasonable to merge and redirect. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've copied the content over on to the main BHA article. It seems merging is the quickest and simplest way to resolve this AfD. Then if there are concerns about notability or tone, they can be addressed by editing the section or getting consensus on Talk:British Humanist Association to remove. I'll contact proposer. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]