Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resort Properties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 01:09, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spam for timeshare company (which should be a deletion criterion on its own), no asserion of notability, original text was POV and mostly a link. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 12:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. feydey 12:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, advert substubs. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:46, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. PJM 14:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Jasmol 18:14, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. *drew 00:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Linked from a page on timeshare along with other timeshare companies. Completely relevant. Why, Guy, do you feel you have the right to rubbish a legitimate industry you know nothing about. This type of attitude surely undermines the fundamental nature of Wiki.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.