Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Response Dynamics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Treating as a speedy since there was minimal discussion and no non-disruptive user requesting deletion. RL0919 (talk) 19:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Response Dynamics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Response Dynamics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page does not provide reliable media coverage. Washington Post link has only one humble mention. Driodr (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Virginia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Spammer nomination. I'll leave it open to be considered on its merits. MER-C 19:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added a bunch of references, just what I found in about half an hour tonight. The spammer didn't do WP:BEFORE. -Apocheir (talk) 03:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.