- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Retchmail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable software. I'm unable to find any independent third-party references through Google; all the hits seem to be package indices or Wikipedia mirrors. Psychonaut (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lacks non-trivial coverage and fails GNG JBsupreme (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 00:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mentioned in a list of similar software in a book [1]. The other google books hit [2] is an OCR error for fetchmail (I have the book). That's about it. Pcap ping 11:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.