Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retrograde Inversion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrograde Inversion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college band - zero sources, and I couldn't find anything about them anywhere. Does not meet any test of notability; I don't think it's even close. Rockypedia (talk) 00:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this was actually mentioned as "AfD bait" when it first started and it certainly seems like that now, nothing to suggest even minimally better notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Speedy even. - superβεεcat 10:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any evidence that WP:NMUSIC is met. — sparklism ^hey! 13:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.