- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reverse Sheep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested speedy. Article makes no particular claims of notability; only source is a forum and a supporting article (Fleebrog Method) that was created at the same time and deleted as vandalism. A cursory search makes it apparent this is WP:MADEUP at best. §FreeRangeFrog 17:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Frog - both this and the "Fleebrog method" had just the one source and it seems as though each article was created to give the other credibility. pablohablo. 20:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no genuine supporting sources i could find, without any should be deleted Kurtk60 (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N and WP:NOT#MADEUP. Firestorm (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP Andy Dingley (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons stated above Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign!) 19:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.