Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutions of 2010–2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutions of 2010–2012

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know where to begin: the title is terribly obscure, the page makes claims about OWS being a child of the Arab Spring which constitutes original research, and it seems like the see also section is more-or-less haphazard. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks to me to be a unlikely disambiguation page for the recent uprisings. Total disagreement that those revolutions were parent to the occupy movement. I would consider deletion on the grounds of Original Research and for the lack of Reliable Sources. Phearson (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above, and for a total misunderstanding of what a dab page is supposed to be. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While I've read the opinion expressed that the Occupy [YOUR TOWN HERE] movement was a manifestation of the same phenomenon as the so-called "Arab Spring," I don't thing this page with its obscure and unsearchable title advances the encyclopedia. It strikes me as a bit POV. There may come a day, after the books and journal articles are published, when the Arab Spring and OWS are linked as part of some coherent and commonly-named phenomenon. That would be a crystal ball prediction. This seems a delete — for now. Carrite (talk) 02:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE The article doesn't have a link to the current discussion. __meco (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link has been fixed.--JayJasper (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nom. & others. Original research, utterly unencyclopedic.--JayJasper (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nonsense and Crystal Bol. And Occupy is not a revolution but a hype. Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not hype. rather, movement. Phearson (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Arab Spring --Article editor (talk) 19:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.