Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewilding Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewilding Australia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article makes no claim to notability or provide sources. Grahame (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am very interested in this general topic. I recently read an article advocating introducing Tasmanian Devils to the mainland to combat feral cats and rabbits. However this article has no sources and most of it is not even about the topic, but about present problems. A good article on the movement naming names and citing sources would be welcome. Northwestgnome (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 06:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while undoubtedly an important issue, I'm not finding any sources, at least under this general direction of the article. Cocytus [»talk«] 23:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.