- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rex (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-Notable open source software. A search turns up several links but they are merely press releases and trivial coverage and mentions. Hu12 (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect to Comparison of open source configuration management software: There don't seem to be enough available sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Beyond that, this software is just another Puppet or Chef, so it's not likely to meet the significance requirement. And so far there aren't manuals about Rex, nor is it covered in courses. -- BenTels (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 14:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.