- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rhombus cipher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and no indication of notability. There are exactly *two* GHITs, both of which are on Twitter. King Jakob C2 21:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Hit the button prior to me. Checked Google Scholar and Books with no hits. Wish there was a speedy category for this. II | (t - c) 21:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @ImperfectlyInformed: (What's the "button prior to me" ? I'm guessing either you have a gadget/script, or you're referring to one of the links in {{Find sources}} ? Ta. ) –Quiddity (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A recently invented cipher which nobody has taken note of as I can find no discussion about it in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.