- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard C. Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability; mostly self-sourced, third-party sources have passing or no mention (the only substantial source, before I removed it, was deprecated source globalresearch.ca); WP:BEFORE shows only fringe sources. Has never been a well-sourced article. Not even notable as fringe. PROD removed, but with no effort to remedy the issues. Doesn't even seem notable per WP:NFRINGE, let alone WP:GNG. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not enough sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 07:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Sourcing and claims are self-published. Bearian (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.