Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right to Repeal Amendment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 21:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right to Repeal Amendment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence given of notability, no external references given, no likelihood of actually getting on the Senate floor, never mind passed into law. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No discussion on Google News Archive or Google Books. Four sponsors in U.S. Senate, and it would need 67 to advance. Not notable, at least now. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no congressional action since introduction and only the four original cosponsors are cosponsors months later, can't locate significant coverage. Hekerui (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. & others. No secondary sources, no significant coverage, non notable.--JayJasper (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.