- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted. Dreadstar † 03:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rima Morrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a controversial biographical article about an academic of unclear notability. It is poorly referenced and parts of it seem to be irrelevant puffery which makes it harder to see where any substantial claim of notability lies or whether the claims made are verifiable. The subject of the article has been editing it and arguing on the talk page. The subject has become angry and is accusing another editor of libel. We need to decide whether the article has a future and then sort it out if it does. DanielRigal (talk) 00:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem as if this article needs to be on the wiki. Thedjatclubrock :-) (T/C) 01:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete fails A7 --Rtphokie (talk) 02:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Poorly referenced and written in non-NPOV voice. Luksuh 02:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sense of neology.--Freewayguy (Webmail) 02:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete the person seems to be notable to some extent, but on the other hand the article is written poorly, and the chances that it will improve (and that some editor will decide to spend time wikizing it) are not very high. Pundit|utter 02:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.