Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rithvik Raja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:16, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rithvik Raja

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rithvik Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DEL-REASON - 8 - Non notable awards and the subject is affiliated with Hindu News (https://www.thehindu.com/profile/author/Rithvik-Raja/). There is no independent coverage for general notability guidelines. Harjeethsingh69 (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The subject is not Notable and the given sources in the current version doesn't provide any proof of Notability. Taabii (talk) 06:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given that the nominator has only made 3 edits, I would like this article to have a further review by experienced editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a BLP lacking significant coverage. Sources are: (1) primarily about his teacher/mentor, (2) an interview, and (3) an article from The Hindu that appears to be a regurgitated press release. The list of external links could be the start of a better article, but it's not our job to find better sources for a BLP. The subject looks and sounds charming, but that's not a reason to keep. I would not oppose draftification. Bearian (talk) 08:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.