- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 19:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Roark Junior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Despite him being a antagonist in Sin City, this guy doesn't assert ANY type of notability. He doesn't need his own article. ZeroGiga (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 21:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no independent coverage. Graevemoore (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong KEEP, This charactor does play a very important role in the book and movie, and as stated is the primary antagonist. 69.196.141.228 (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jonny-mt 14:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No third-party sources, so it's all OR. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as pure WP:NOT#OR. Razorflame 19:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.