Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Baird (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Rob Baird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't know if this qualifies for CSD as a recreation of an article deleted by a previous AFD. This one lacks even the one independent source of the deleted previous attempt, and a google search didn't indicate that this artist has any additional notability gained since November 2011 (when the last afd took place). Syrthiss (talk) 12:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I tried to verify the rankings on the Texas Music Chart, but it looks like past rankings are behind a paywall so can only confirm things that are currently listed. That is, assuming that the Texas Music Chart is even a reliable source for notability. Syrthiss (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I don't believe the Texas Music Chart is sufficient to meet criterion 2 of WP:MUSICBIO. As far as coverage, I've found a Dallas News piece and reviews at The 9513 and Roughstock. If the latter two sources are acceptable in helping to establish notability, then the subject barely meets WP:GNG and criterion 1 of MUSICBIO. Gongshow Talk 08:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.