Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Bertholf (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 08:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Bertholf (3rd nomination)

Moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Bertholf
Moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeppo Network (2nd nomination)

Group nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeppo Network (2nd nomination) closed with "delete", except for Rob Bertholf which was not really addressed during discussion. No opinion. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-17 21:36Z

Delete non notable. self-promotion. --JW1805 (Talk) 00:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as self promotion with no acceptable sources. --Kevin Murray 03:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if after two AfDs there are still no verifiable independent sources I guess none will be forthcoming Alf photoman 01:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable, only a soldier with tour of duty ribbons - self promotionLeonspence 17:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless very good reliable sources are found to establish notability. A WP:HEY effort will be required to sway my vote due to the abuse of WP:AUTO and WP:COI, and the page blanking. John Vandenberg 08:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.