Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Cornilles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Cornilles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cornilles one true claim to fame is being a defeated candidate for US House of Representatives. This is not enough to establish notability John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as literally as trivial as it gets, there's nothing here for significance, since everything is either job-focused or simply trivial in the meaning of the word altogether. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-winning candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates; if you cannot credibly claim and reliably source that he was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he has to win the seat, not just run for it, to become eligible because of his political activity itself. But this does not demonstrate any reason at all why he would be eligible for an article. Bearcat (talk) 14:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.