• Home
  • Random
  • Nearby
  • Log in
  • Settings
Donate Now If Wikipedia is useful to you, please give today.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Fyfe

  • Project page
  • Talk
  • Language
  • Watch
  • Edit
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — neuro(talk) 23:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Fyfe

edit
Rob Fyfe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notability not established and original-research replacement of a copy-vio page. Merely being the CEO of a corporation does not equate to notability. There are thousands of CEOs, but they have to have accomplished something notable for an entry. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep CEO of a really notable public company like Air New Zealand is in my opinion notable. and yes, thousands of business executives are notable--probably tens of thousands. why shouldn't they be? It's a position of public importance, and holding it is the notable accomplishment. TOOMANYOFTHEMARENOTABLE is not an argument for deletion. The article is in any case sourceable--I asked the nom, who is an expert on the subject, to try to actually source it, but he didn't choose to. I do not know why. DGG (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Because the subject is not notable. Merely getting a job, no matter how important in a corporation, is not notable. What has he actually achieved? Harry the Dog WOOF 20:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DGG. Being the CEO of an international airline seems to satisfy any reasonable notability requirement. Stifle (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 22:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 22:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep could do with some expansion but it's a valid stub and there's plenty of sources (in addition to simple places where he's just quoted) from which to build an article. StarM 22:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, becasue he is CEO of a notable company, but tag as a stub. It ought to be exapnded to say what he has acheived during his serivice with the company. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep, as CEO of a notable company, and one of the more important figures in New Zealand business.-gadfium 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rob_Fyfe&oldid=1140137190"
Last edited on 18 February 2023, at 17:06

Languages

      This page is not available in other languages.

      Wikipedia
      • Wikimedia Foundation
      • Powered by MediaWiki
      • This page was last edited on 18 February 2023, at 17:06 (UTC).
      • Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
      • Privacy policy
      • About Wikipedia
      • Disclaimers
      • Contact Wikipedia
      • Code of Conduct
      • Developers
      • Statistics
      • Cookie statement
      • Terms of Use
      • Desktop