Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Tyrrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Tyrrell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rob Tyrrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no in-depth coverage of him, only passing mentions and routine listings, the two sources in the article are not reliable Theroadislong (talk) 18:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. While he does meet #6 of WP:MUSICBIO as "a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles", the guideline page also states "meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 04:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'd argue that the two bands he was a member of are both not notable, and therefore he doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO - the bands in question may both have independently included future internationally famous musicians, but neither of them pass WP:BAND in their own right. Richard3120 (talk) 12:34, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence of independent notability outside of a few bands he was involved with. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Simply not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG, and I agree with the above editor who doesn't think the two bands he was part of meet the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.