Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Vardaro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Vardaro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rob Vardaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as a soldier or as an actor. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Well he doesn't pass WP:NACTOR so it's down to coverage of his war record. Also the article is the same as IMDb here so G12 may apply, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. Mztourist (talk) 04:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Doesn't pass anything in WP:BIO. Can't find any independent, reliable sources besides the two already listed in the article. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet GNG. Intothatdarkness 16:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I take the opposite tack to Atlantic306: to me he's obviously non-notable as a soldier and the article authors did themselves no favours using the military person infobox. Simply serving in the ranks during a war and getting wounded is nowhere near enough: you have to play a significant part. As to WP:NACTOR, the requirement is Has had significant roles in multiple notable films. Since three of his films have articles, we'll call them notable, but he isn't even listed among the cast of two of them, and roles like "mercenary" and "FBI agent" don't sound like significant parts to me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.