Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Wheway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Liberal Party (UK, 1989). (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Wheway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough. Alligators1974 (talk) 11:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Liberal Party (UK, 1989): Neither a one-year term as president of a small party nor a term as an elected member of a local council is sufficient for WP:POLITICIAN criteria 1 or 3. Nor am I seeing the coverage which could meet criterion 2 and while the subject's other activity has had some coverage I think it falls short of the broader WP:BASIC criteria for encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 10:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to [[Liberal Party (UK, 1989) sounds ideal Alligators1974 (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.