Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User:Jytdog prodded it with the following rationale: " subject does not meet WP:GNG", to which I'd add "and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)/Wikipedia:Notability (music) requirements. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale "significant coverage in Chicago Tribune makes this borderline; please don't use PROD to delete borderline articles". The article in CT seems reliable, however it is the one and only piece of reliable, in-depth coverage I can see. Outside of that, the subject is very, well, small-time, and has not attracted serious coverage that I can find (there are certainly passing mentions and such, but those don't suffice). PS. There are also additional COI issues here discussed on article's talk, but they should not affect a decision to keep this or not. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per my original PROD. Thanks for following through. Jytdog (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 05:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 05:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unable to find any other significant coverage. I added a second ref but it is somewhat WP:ROUTINE and so I don't believe it meets WP:SIGCOV. ~Kvng (talk) 15:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.