- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:HEY and the withdrawal of the nominator (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Robbie Kay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER - only one significant role in a notable film (the guidelines require multiple) and lack of reliable secondary sources —Snigbrook 23:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawing nomination – sources have been found, and I don't think the reasons I mentioned still apply. —Snigbrook 14:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep According to this description of Fugutive Pieces, his role in that is also significant. There are also several publications discussing the kid, which I will add now. (several publications I found also single out Kay's performance for praise which also suggests it wasn't a minor role) - Mgm|(talk) 09:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Article now expanded beyond stub status. - Mgm|(talk) 13:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, film makers don't spend money on flying an actor across the ocean to attend the Toronto Film Festival unless they had a significant part in the production.[1] - Mgm|(talk) 18:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.