- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert Splinter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP. No significant coverage found. Michig (talk) 07:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it fails Wikipedia:Notability. I didn't find anything on him when I searched Yahoo and Google. The history suggests a conflict of interest and sole promotional reasons. SwisterTwister talk 00:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 12:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.