Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and with very little notability. Most of the third party references refer merely to funding. The awards are relatively trivial--top 100 of anything is not notability, nor is a second place prize. The rest of the article describes the merits of the products in terms that belong in an advertisement not a encyclopedia article. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an excellent reason for deletion . Once we become a vehicle for promotion, we're useless as an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I have found nothing better at all aside from expected PR of course, nothing at all convincing here and that's not surprising considering it's only about 3 years old, nothing minimally convincing here. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I find nothing except three press releases. No independent coverage. Fails WP:CORP. MB (talk) 21:08, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Purely promotional, company not notable. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.