Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robomilk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  00:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable website. -- RHaworth 01:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:WEB and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with the proposer above. --die Baumfabrik 03:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- Samir ∙ T C 08:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 08:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 09:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. Just zis Guy you know? 12:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, non-notable website --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 12:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. It is clearly self-promotion. Kukini 15:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. -- Alpha269 15:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable website, self-promotion. JIP | Talk 17:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Shoulda just used {{prod}} on this one. Cyde Weys 22:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "His first using XHTML"... Moe Aboulkheir 02:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.