- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Tony Hawk's#Robomodo era (2008–2015). (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robomodo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article doesn't include any references to significant coverage of the company. Searching there is SIGCOV of the games they developed but not the company itself or they are primary sources (see these: IGN interview, GameSpot interview News about XBLA game. Mika1h (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Illinois. Mika1h (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: They made several triple-A Tony Hawk's games FMSky (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete "They made games" is an insufficient rationale, because notability is not inherited. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5. Their most infamous game which they were greatly associated with and far more reliable on hindsight. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- "most infamous game" isn't necessarily the best target for an encyclopedia, nevertheless redirect to Tony Hawk's should be fine by me. IgelRM (talk) 07:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm fine with it. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would not agree with a redirect. While that may be, they still made a bunch of Tony Hawk games and others, and it would be WP:SURPRISE to send them to one particular game. A redirect has to make more sense than letting the search function do its job, and this does not. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- There is a specific section Tony Hawk's#Robomodo era (2008–2015), which we could anchor to? Would that alleviate SURPRISE? IgelRM (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would be fine with a redirect to that section then. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- There is a specific section Tony Hawk's#Robomodo era (2008–2015), which we could anchor to? Would that alleviate SURPRISE? IgelRM (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I would not agree with a redirect. While that may be, they still made a bunch of Tony Hawk games and others, and it would be WP:SURPRISE to send them to one particular game. A redirect has to make more sense than letting the search function do its job, and this does not. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm fine with it. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- "most infamous game" isn't necessarily the best target for an encyclopedia, nevertheless redirect to Tony Hawk's should be fine by me. IgelRM (talk) 07:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5. Their most infamous game which they were greatly associated with and far more reliable on hindsight. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.