- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Robot2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant independent anywhere, as far as I can see. Proposed film, the proposal having been announced by a cameraman. There are no independent sources at all. Time for an article if and when it (a) exists, and (b) has received enough attention to establish notability. (PROD was contested by the author.) JamesBWatson (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This one's a no brainer: WP:NFF states "films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles" and the article and refs state that work on the script has not even started. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur with the reasons already given. Safiel (talk) 01:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with the first user. Non-notable. --Djc wi (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete, per nom. EelamStyleZ (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. just speculation--Sodabottle (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.