Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robots 2 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previously deleted in 2005 - (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robots 2), now recreated. There is nothing on the Net that I can find that says that this movie, scheduled for 2010, exists. imdb never heard of it, all of the Google hits are from immediately following the release of Robots saying that the creators are talking about a sequel. The character names and the actors are all made up out of whole cloth. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fiction of this sort has no place. humblefool® 01:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete see you in 2009. Opabinia regalis 02:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Crystal ballery -M^ask 02:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. Dionyseus 06:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Crystal ball Konman72 09:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Wikipedia is not a fairground attraction where your fortune is told with the use of a ball of glass and a strange woman dressed in sheets Martinp23 10:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 'til it's on the IMB at least. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as everyone else. If it was on IMB alone, I would still vote delete. The fact is isn't... Well. J Milburn 13:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and protect: If it was recreated after initial deletion, then it is most likely to be recreated again! I recommend semi-protection, since the first editor was an IP address.--Ed^{talk c E} 15:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Do they even plan movies like this for 4+ years? They wouldn't have the cast set in stone this far in advance either. No credible sources can be found. will381796 16:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Just having a page reserved to possible future product isn't what wikipedia is for. syvanen 20:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete crystal ball. -- That Guy, From That Show! 20:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.