Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Machine Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Electrosexual. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:01, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Rock Machine Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
vanity label with no real claim to notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not Notable. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to Electrosexual. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Electrosexual, as above. Not independently notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.