Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocking Soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rocking Soccer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage whatsoever from reliable sources. The1337gamer (talk) 05:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 05:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As the person that created this page, I will say that this is a real game. Ok it may not be up to standards like some other games but this can easily be improved with hard work. Matt294069 is coming 05:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be easily improved? There are no reliable sources covering this game at all. It clearly fails Wikipedia's notability criteria. --The1337gamer (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

h — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChilenoDeCorazon308 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— ChilenoDeCorazon308 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete. WP:ITEXISTS is not an argument, and a quick Google search shows no coverage by reliable sources. Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 07:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another Comment Well why not add Maxithlon to this list thien as that fails WP:GNG. Matt294069 is coming 22:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a discussion on Rocking Soccer, not Maxithlon. If you feel another article should be deleted then go ahead and nominate it. In this case, saying other stuff exists is a poor argument to keep this article on Wikipedia. --The1337gamer (talk) 05:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability. ZettaComposer (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches are simply finding nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.