Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodicindo Yee Rodriguez II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rodicindo Yee Rodriguez II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person; WP:N, WP:BLP. Contested PROD. Smappy (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD A7. Article contains no credible claims of significance -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. His claims to significance seem to be in writing and in politics, but I can't find any reviews of his book, nor does he appear to ever have held a political office. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete on notability concerns. Coverage of his graphic novel can be found here: [1], [2], [3], but none of these satisfy the general notability guideline, and none verify any of the content currently in the article. He does appear to be running for office (see [4]), but that, in and of itself, does not qualify for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lear's Fool (talk • contribs)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unusually small number of ghits and no good references. MiRroar (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable IMHO. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• ^Speak! 11:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.