Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Berman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Berman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO I would prod but it has been on wiki since 2005 Wintonian (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silverseren^C 00:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silverseren^C 00:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have added sources that establish notability. Silverseren^C 00:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Leader of a major city council, with local news coverage when he's one of the first people to enter a civil partnership? Pretty notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as effectively the mayor of a reasonably sized city. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is not a boundaryline case. Cardiff is the capital of Wales; mayors of national capitals are usually notable . Certainly the >1k Gnews results would suggest so. Ray^Talk 22:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Ample news coverage of this guy. Dream Focus 07:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.