Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanova language
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 05:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Romanova language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Yet another nonnotable conlang based on Romance languages. No assertion of any scholarly discussion of this language, or any actual use of it. —Angr 10:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Angr 10:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No assertion of notability. Just because it exists doesn't mean it belongs here. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the second link is to a defunct blog; the first has an entry which seems to have been added today. Wikipedia is not for languages made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable conlang. --Revolución hablar ver 14:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- while there are some notable constructed languages, there's no indication that this is one of them. Mandsford (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Note this article was prodded and deleted before.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:28, March 2, 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.