- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rombie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per OR, V, and NEO. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 00:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. I can't find any uses of this term in reliable sources, let alone anything that actually defines it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage found that backs up the information. ƒingersonRoids 18:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism. — Jake Wartenberg 16:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.