Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romesh and Lakshan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Romesh and Lakshan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sophisticate evidence of the coverage required to meet notability requirements. This is personal promotion.Wipeouting (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. —Wipeouting (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Wipeouting (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - I doubt it is personal promotion. There's no real evidence for that. There is this article about them. If more can be uncovered, then this would be a keep. -- Whpq (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: One source isn't enough. Joe Chill (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.