- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, non-admin closure - Peripitus (Talk) 02:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rompo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable creature from a book. FusionMix 14:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Actually, it's a mythological creature referenced in an Encyclopedia of mythological creatures. Dlohcierekim 15:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PS. Attests from here, here, and here. Other Google book hits were not visited. Dlohcierekim 16:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I see...hmm. I still don't think that it needs an article all to itself, perhaps there is a 'list of mythological creatures' article it could be merged into? FusionMix 16:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Possibly you're thinking of List of monsters? —Quasirandom (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I see...hmm. I still don't think that it needs an article all to itself, perhaps there is a 'list of mythological creatures' article it could be merged into? FusionMix 16:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Legendary creature covered in secondary sources -- that latter's pretty much the definition of notability. Or if you insist, of notability for fictional things. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My rule of thumb is that if it's notable enough for a paper encyclopedia (which has size constraints), then it is notable enough for an unlimited electronic encyclopedia. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I pretty agree with that rule of thumb. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My rule of thumb is that if it's notable enough for a paper encyclopedia (which has size constraints), then it is notable enough for an unlimited electronic encyclopedia. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.