- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. I'm open to a restore if he ships me some of that pot of cash he's got. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ron Cornor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable and quite possibly bullshit. Discovered a start-up called Microsoft and invested some of the original money- and yet there's no record of this anywhere? It claims he's on the times rich list; the rich list has no record of him. Google pulls up squat, unless he became an estate agent when I wasn't looking. Ironholds (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and speedy db-hoax would work for me. Good research. - Dank (push to talk) 16:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 16:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- G3 Hoax. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious hoax. just a little insignificant 17:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. About as believable as the list of female movie stars who've slept with a fifteen-year-old blogger called Kevin. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.