Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Root Bug hypothesis
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Swarm we ♥ our hive 07:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Root Bug hypothesis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:GNG. All sources in the article and that I've found in searching are primary sources. No significant coverage beyond what the creator of this idea and their affiliates have published. ~ RobTalk 15:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete It sounds like a good concept, but an encyclopedia is not the place to introduce it. If it gets the attention of "reliable sources" then have an article here. Borock (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete (draft/userfy if wished) - My searches found nothing particularly good and the although the article is neat and sourced, the sources could be a little better. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.