Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Root info solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Root info solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Companies need to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. In this case, it is missing reliable independent sources which talk about the company in detail. Marvellous Spider-Man 13:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Kleuske (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The main article text and references establish only that this is a registered company going about its business, with no claim of notability. Nor are my own searches finding anything to establish WP:CORPDEPTH. (The Root_info_solutions#Complaints section is sourced only to forum posting allegations. I have left it in place for the time being, though in my opinion it contributes nothing to establishing notability; if the article did survive this AfD, that section should be removed as unreliably-sourced.) AllyD (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepGupta Dindayal (talk) 05:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC): It's neutral, non-promotional; reference sources are reliable independent, not based on any self published work. The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haas_Automation also talks about Root info solutions. Gupta Dindayal (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection with User:Archana Gupta247? Marvellous Spider-Man 14:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KeepGupta Dindayal (talk) 05:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC): I don't know who wrote this article? But I think this article is about one month old, If I'm not wrong. At least 1000+ moderator on Wikipedia, nobody taken any action but suddenly why? I don't know.[reply]

I'm agree with !--(User talk:Gupta Dindayal) Template:Unsigned -->— Preceding unsigned comment added by Saroj Naagar (talk • contribs) 09:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These two editors are showing WP:DUCK behaviour. Marvellous Spider-Man 03:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My sincere apologies User:Marvellous Spider-Man for anything that made you draw this conclusion; but let's stay up to the spirit of Wikipedia, doing what's desired.Gupta Dindayal (talk) 06:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion was regarding the article, not for or against any individual — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saroj Naagar (talk • contribs) 09:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Routine sources are insufficient. Nothing better found. Grayfell (talk) 02:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.