Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 193 (STM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Route 193 (STM)

An article for each local bus route is not needed. Rufus843 15:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, unless we're missing some sort of special significance for this route? Corpx 16:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it for CSD Corpx 16:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 18:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. No "multiple reliable and independent sources" with substantial coverage to satisfy WP:N, and no guideline saying that every bus route in the history of the world has inherent notability. On the other hand, a well sourced article on the history and significance of the Montreal mass transit system would be quite encyclopedic. Edison 19:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 20:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

What about article on Paris bus (in French), I guess that we should delete them too, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robin Hood 1212 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]