- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 22:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ruby Jacenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not satisfy the criteria to have a biograhpy. It is a sham and a poor attempt at boosting her own so called profile for personal means Dukeofsydney (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I prodded this almost a year ago with the comment "No significant encyclopedic coverage in independent reliable sources" and that still applies. Most coverage is self-generated or tabloidy in nature. The-Pope (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no indication of meeting WP:BIO. allegedly dating famous people does not make one notable. LibStar (talk) 03:57, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per LibStar, no assertion of notability, fails WP:BIO. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 04:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This hilarious piece says it all. Mabalu (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, but I would point out that there was no need for the nominator to use such rude and hostile language when making this nomination. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.