- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ruby True (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
found at BLP Prod, but has references of sorts. Although not my usual field, does not seem to meet the standards for the subject. DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not my field either (and I wouldn't admit it if it was), but not seeing sufficient notability claimed or assertable. --Legis (talk - contribs) 09:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Don't see notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramaksoud2000 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neither the article nor subsequent research presented on the subject demonstrate that she is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable (poor references). --Greenmaven (talk) 23:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.