Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Tuesday (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby Tuesday (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article solely based on an IMDB entry but evidently a stage name based on the Stones song "Ruby Tuesday" of 1966, two years earlier for an actress who, if she was notable, will be somewhere else on wp under her own name. Merits a note in the low-budget film She-Devils on Wheels 1968 to say that the actress is unidentified, but not a stub based on a single IMDB stagename. All the other actors and actresses in the film are redlinks, no reason why whoever is under the stagename shouldn't be a redlink too. Chances are if she later became famous, which none of her co-stars did, it'd be recorded in a source. But it isn't. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wouldn't be surprised if the IMDb entry for this person actually combined the careers of multiple people using this same pseudonym. But even if all the roles belonged to the same person, it's not clear that she would be notable. IMDb has no biographical information about her, and most of the news articles linked on her IMDb page actually refer to Ruby Tuesday (restaurant). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
THAT particular result is caused by the stupidity of the IMDB database net crawler program and its searching for and adding items that simply include a actor's name, no matter the "name" possibly belonging to something else entirely. Sometimes this can lead to sources usable by Wikipedia. More often not. Our own "Find sources", as set by an AFD template, is itself imperfect. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. BLP violation, associating one or more performers in mainstream films with one or more porn performers using similar pseudonyms. No indication that any of the various performers whose careers are combined on the IMDB page are remotely notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking decent sourcability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Now a MILF pornstar it seems..♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.